A purchase from a conversation. No click. No landing page.
ChatGPT Ads vs Google and Meta: What Actually Changes
ChatGPT ads are coming - but they won't kill Google or Meta. Here is what shifts, what stays the same, and how to be ready before everyone else wakes up.
Imagine you open your Shopify dashboard one day and traffic is down - but revenue is up. Record day. And you have no idea how.
No one clicked an ad. No one visited your store. The sale came from a conversation. That is the shift Chris sees coming, and in his view it is closer than most brands think.
How Google, Meta, and ChatGPT each work
Let's start with what we already know.
Google Ads is demand capture. Someone searches for something specific, you intercept them at the bottom of the funnel, they click, they buy. Context and keyword based. That is why Google Shopping tends to have a high ROAS - the intent is already there. The downside is it is competitive and the options are limited once a user is in that search.
Meta Ads is demand creation. You interrupt someone mid-scroll, spark desire, and push them toward a purchase they were not already planning. Interest and audience based. Meta has enormous amounts of data on its users, which is why it can serve a very relevant ad to someone who was not even looking.
ChatGPT - or any large language model - does something different. Chris describes it like this: with Google you are saying "I'm looking for X, I want to buy." With Meta it is "I wasn't really looking, but now I want it." With ChatGPT the frame is "I'm looking for this - tell me what to buy and why."
That is a different type of discovery. You are not just searching and clicking. You are in a conversation with a shopping consultant that gives you recommendations, walks you through comparisons, surfaces reviews, and then links you directly to a checkout. No landing page in between. The purchase happens inside the chat.
Which funnel stage ChatGPT actually owns
This is where it gets clear - and where the hype starts to fall apart a bit.
ChatGPT does not own the bottom of the funnel yet. When you want something right now, you still go to Google. You grab your phone, you search, you buy. That habit is deeply set. Chris is direct about this: ChatGPT is not really established for purchase-intent searches. People still prefer Google - or go straight to Amazon - when they are ready to buy.
Where ChatGPT is strong is the upper and mid funnel - the discovery phase. Someone has a problem. They want to learn. They want to compare options. They want to ask follow-up questions and get a recommendation before they commit. That is the conversation mode. And in that mode, ChatGPT is genuinely better than Google today.
Think about it as a funnel. Google lives at the bottom. Meta tries to cover the top and push down. ChatGPT sits in the middle - learning, comparing, recommending - and then hands off to Google or Meta to close the sale.
| Platform | Funnel stage | User mindset | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Shopping | Lower funnel | I want it now, show me where to buy | |
| Meta Ads | Upper to mid funnel | I wasn't looking, but now I want this | |
| ChatGPT / LLM ads | Upper to mid funnel | I have a problem - tell me what to buy and why |
What ChatGPT ad types will probably look like
Nobody has a crystal ball here. But based on how the platform works, Chris sees a few formats that are very likely to arrive.
Shopping-style feed ads. Just like Google Shopping shows a carousel of products with images and prices, ChatGPT will probably surface a feed of five or six brand options within a conversation when you ask for recommendations. The infrastructure will need to be connected to a product feed - same principle as Google. How you get there is different. It is not one search query and one result. It might surface partway through a conversation when the timing makes sense.
Follow-up and retargeting ads. If you had a purchase-driven conversation the day before but did not buy, there could be follow-up ads - either in a new chat or as display ads alongside one - pulling you back to the problem you were solving. Standard retargeting logic, just in a new context.
Display and image ads. Relevant image ads alongside the chat, based on the context and interests ChatGPT has built from your conversations. Very similar to Google Display or Meta image ads, just informed by conversation history.
Video ads. Chris does not see these coming as strongly at first. If they appear, it might be within a recommendation - ChatGPT surfaces a product video as part of explaining a solution. Or, potentially, a non-skippable format before a new chat starts - similar to how YouTube pre-roll works today. CPM-based rather than CPC.
Listicle recommendation ads. You ask ChatGPT for the top five Google Ads agencies in your city. The first two results are ads - clearly labeled as such - but formatted like organic recommendations with pros, cons, and context. For ecom, same idea: top five running shoes for flat feet, with paid placements mixed in.
What this means for Google - and why it is not going anywhere
Here is Chris's take, and he is clear about it: Google will not die because of ChatGPT. Not even close.
Google owns the "I want it now" moment. That is not going away. When someone grabs their phone and searches for a product they already want to buy, they are going to Google. That purchase intent is baked into the behaviour and Google Shopping captures it better than anything else. That is what makes Google Ads such a strong channel for ecom brands and that strength is not under threat from a conversational AI.
Where Google is more exposed is the discovery and comparison phase - the part of the funnel where someone is still figuring out what to buy. ChatGPT handles that better today. But Chris expects Google to adapt. Gemini is already being built into search results. If conversational discovery becomes the dominant mode, Google will push further in that direction. They are not sleeping on it.
What will change, in Chris's view, is the competition level on Google. Less casual browsing, more high-intent searches. More competition for the same clicks. Attribution will also get messier - it is already complicated, and if a user discovers a product through ChatGPT and then buys via Google, the picture gets harder to read with no clear click to track back to the original touchpoint.
Google still owns this "I want it now" moment - you grab your phone, you look for something, you buy. That will not change quickly.
What this means for Meta - and why it is also fine
Same story, different angle. Meta will not be replaced by ChatGPT. Meta will stay the king of demand creation. People still spend enormous amounts of time on social media. The attention is there. The platform still introduces new brands, tests creative angles, builds desire, and drives awareness better than anything else.
Where Meta has a gap is certainty. Meta sells attention - it interrupts you and sparks interest. But it cannot give you the back-and-forth confidence that a conversation can. "I want to compare these three options and ask follow-up questions" - Meta cannot do that. ChatGPT can.
That is why both Meta and Google are building their own AI layers. Meta AI inside the feed. Gemini inside search. Both platforms can see that the middle of the funnel - the discovery and comparison phase - is where the conversation platforms will be strong. Neither wants to outsource that phase to a competitor.
Chris's prediction: Meta will still dominate for introducing brands and building awareness. But the actual purchase decision process - the research, the comparison, the "should I buy this?" moment - may shift toward platforms where conversation is native. Comparing Google vs Meta for your ecom brand already involves thinking about funnel stage - add ChatGPT as a third layer and the same logic applies.
How to prepare before everyone else wakes up
This is the part that matters for right now. ChatGPT ads are not live in the way Google and Meta ads are. But the things that will make you win on that platform when it opens up are things you can build today.
Trust and social proof. ChatGPT is recommendation-based. If your brand does not have real trust signals - reviews, external mentions, authority signals - the model will not push you easily, even with paid ads. Low trust can mean higher CPCs, higher CPMs, or even policy disapprovals. The platforms will want quality advertisers, especially at launch.
Clean product data and feed structure. The better your product information is structured, the easier it is for the AI to target it correctly. This is the same principle that makes a well-built product feed critical for Google Shopping - clean data travels across platforms. No sales fluff. Real product information the model can read and recommend on its own terms.
Content that answers buying questions. If ChatGPT is a discovery engine - all about problems, solutions, and recommendations - then content that answers real buying questions is what wins. Not ad copy built for interruption. Content built for a user who is asking "what should I buy and why?" That kind of content works as organic discovery and as the foundation of ads that feel native to a conversation.
Existing brand demand and authority. This ties back to trust. If you are already a known brand with real demand, you will have an easier time getting approved and performing on a conversation platform. If you are trying to fake authority with a thin brand, it will not hold up under a model that can cross-reference everything it knows.
None of these are new ideas. They are the same foundations that make a Google Ads account work properly - clean data, real trust, content that matches intent. ChatGPT ads will reward the same fundamentals.
The real size of the shift
Chris is direct here too: do not overhype it. ChatGPT ads will not be a magic switch. He compares it to TikTok - TikTok has been around for years, TikTok Ads has been around for years, and only recently with TikTok Shop has it become genuinely interesting for ecom brands. And it still has weaknesses compared to Google and Meta.
Early ChatGPT ads will be cheap - CPCs and CPMs will be very low while the platform is new. But cheap does not mean effective. There will be a lot of testing. A lot of formats that do not quite work yet. A lot of advertisers burning budget while the platform figures itself out.
It is another channel. Not a replacement. An addition to what is already working. The brands that win will be the ones who are already solid on Google and Meta, understand the funnel logic, and approach the new platform with the same discipline they bring everywhere else.
If you want to understand where your current Google and Meta setup sits before the landscape adds another layer, see how we run accounts at ZenoX or check out the full scaling playbook. Build the foundation right now - and the new platforms will be easier to win on when they open up.
Frequently asked questions
Will ChatGPT ads replace Google Shopping?
No. In Chris's view, Google still owns the "I want it now" moment - the point where someone grabs their phone, searches for something, and buys. That behaviour is deeply set and ChatGPT has not broken into it. Google Shopping captures that high-intent search better than any other platform, and that strength is not under threat from a conversational AI.
Which part of the buying funnel will ChatGPT ads own?
The upper and mid funnel - the discovery phase. People use ChatGPT to learn, compare options, ask follow-up questions, and get recommendations before they commit. They still go to Google (or straight to Amazon) when they are ready to buy. ChatGPT is not established for purchase-intent searches yet.
What ad formats will ChatGPT likely offer?
Chris expects five formats: shopping-style feed ads that surface five or six brand options in a conversation; follow-up ads that retarget users who had a purchase-driven chat but did not buy; display and image ads based on conversation context; video ads that appear as part of a recommendation or before a new chat starts; and listicle recommendation ads where paid placements sit alongside organic results.
Will ChatGPT ads be cheap at first?
Yes - CPCs and CPMs will likely be very low when the platform is new. But cheap does not mean effective. Chris compares it to TikTok, which took years to become a genuinely useful ecom channel. Early on there will be a lot of testing and formats that do not quite work yet.
What do ecom brands need to do to prepare for ChatGPT ads?
Chris points to four things: build trust and social proof so the model will recommend you; keep product data clean and well-structured so the AI can read and target it; create content that answers real buying questions rather than sales copy; and build existing brand demand and authority, because weak brands will struggle to get approved or perform on a recommendation-based platform.
Will ChatGPT ads replace Meta?
No. In Chris's view, Meta will stay the king of demand creation. People still spend huge amounts of time on social media, so the attention is there. Where Meta has a gap is in the discovery and comparison phase - the back-and-forth where someone wants to compare options and ask follow-up questions. That middle-of-funnel research role is where ChatGPT will be strong.
ChatGPT ads are coming. Build the foundations now - and you will be ready when everyone else is still figuring out the basics.